Skip to content
Nexusuro
Clinical Evidence

Clinical data from published peer-reviewed studies.

67% IPSS improvement, 103% Qmax increase, ~95.6% ejaculation preserved, 4.29% overall complication rate — validated across 4 PubMed-indexed studies and multiple Chinese core-journal papers covering over 3,000 patients.

TUCBDP clinical evidence — safety and efficacy data

Data sources: All data on this page are from published peer-reviewed literature and expert consensus documents. Full references at the bottom of the page. See also our technology explainer for how TUCBDP achieves these outcomes.

Functional Result
67% ↓

IPSS Improvement

From 20.2 to 6.6. Huang 2016 (N=565), median FU >3 yr.

Safety Profile
4.29%

Complication Rate

TUCBDP vs. 12.86% TURP (P=0.042). Zhang 2022.

Ejaculation
~95.6%

Ejaculation Preserved

Retrograde ejaculation 4.45%. Gao et al. (N=265).

Key efficacy endpoints

Endpoint Baseline Post-treatment Improvement Source (N)
IPSS 20.2 ± 4.4 6.6 ± 1.1 67% ↓ Huang 2016 (565)
Qmax (mL/s) 8.91 ± 3.13 18.11 103% ↑ Zhou 2022 (2,050)
PVR (mL) 76 ± 8 20 ± 8.5 74% ↓ Huang 2016 (565)
QoL Score 4.6 ± 0.2 1.4 ± 0.3 70% ↓ Huang 2016 (565)

Surgery efficiency

Parameter Value Source
Procedure time 10–25 min Huang 2016 (~10–15 min); Zhang 2022 (18.6±3.2 min); Wang 2020 (25.3±8.6 min)
Catheter indwelling 2.5–3.3 days Zhang 2022 (2.5±0.5d); Wang 2020 (78.9±16.5h)
Hospital stay 1.9–2.9 days Wang 2020 (1.9±0.9d); Zhang 2022 (2.9±0.7d)
Intraoperative blood loss 13.2 ± 4.0 mL Zhang 2022 (vs. TURP 66.5±18.4, P=0.000)
Bladder irrigation time 6.3 ± 2.0 h Zhang 2022 (vs. TURP 45.1±13.8, P=0.000)

Complications — two definitions, two results

Complication rates vary by definition. Zhang 2022 uses a narrow surgical definition; Gao et al. reports a broader set of all post-procedural events. See full MIST comparison for context on how Nexusuro compares to other modalities.

Zhang 2022 — Prospective controlled (N=140)

EventTUCBDPTURP
Secondary bleeding14
Urinary retention01
Bladder neck spasm12
Urinary incontinence13
Total complication rate4.29%12.86%

P=0.042. Zhang D et al. World J Clin Cases. 2022.

Gao et al. — Single-center (N=265)

EventRate
Transient incontinence10.56%
Urinary retention3.01%
Retrograde ejaculation4.45%
Overall (incl. minor)~20%

Gao WX et al. Hubei Provincial Hospital of TCM. Literature compilation p.70.

Sexual function

Measure Baseline Post-treatment Result Source (N)
Ejaculation preserved 95.6% Retrograde ejaculation 4.45% Gao et al. (265)
Erectile function (IIEF-5) 20.96 ± 2.03 21.42 Not affected (p≤0.001) Zhou 2022 (2,050)
MSHQ-EjD-SF 10.47 ± 1.72 improved p≤0.001 Zhou 2022 (2,050)
IIEF-5 (supplementary) 22.71 Good postoperative function Wang LM et al. (265)

Long-term durability

Huang 2016 — N=565, median follow-up >3 years (38–99 months)

MetricValue
IPSS at last follow-up6.6 ± 1.1 (maintained)
Qmax at last follow-up12.8 ± 2.2 mL/s (maintained)
Reoperation rate0.35% (2/565)

Additional finding from Wang 2020: BNC at 1 year — TUSP 2.0% vs TURP 15.7% (P=0.031).

Clinical research laboratory — TUCBDP long-term follow-up data analysis

Published references

PubMed-indexed studies (4)

  1. Huang 2016 — N=565, 38–99mo FU. Medicine. PMID: 27749528
  2. Wang 2020 — N=101, RCT. Ann Transl Med. PMC7475497
  3. Zhou 2022 — N=2,050, 11-city multicenter. Biomed Res Int. PMC9203188
  4. Zhang 2022 — N=140, RCT. World J Clin Cases. PMC9297432

Chinese core journals + consensus (5+)

  1. Gao WX et al. — N=265. Hubei Prov. Hosp. of TCM.
  2. Wang LM et al. — N=265. North China Univ. of Sci. & Tech.
  3. Zhang YF et al. — N=70. Anhui Medical University.
  4. Zhou GY et al. — N=60. Lanxi Hospital of TCM.
  5. Chinese Medical Association — Expert Consensus (2022)

Review the full clinical data package

Schedule a presentation with our medical affairs team for detailed study walkthroughs and the complete literature compilation.

Clinical data on this page are sourced from published peer-reviewed literature and expert consensus documents. Individual results vary. This page does not constitute medical advice. Manufactured in partnership with Hangzhou Hongyuan Medical Co., Ltd., a company holding NMPA registration and ISO 13485 certification.